AINEWIntegrationsPricingBlog
English
Log InTry for free
CompareNEW

Why teams switch to Easylim

Honest comparison with the tools you already know — no marketing, just features, limits and pricing.

Switch to EasylimSee pricing

Pick a tool to compare

See Easylim side-by-side with the products you've likely worked with.

Easylim vs Trello

Trello

Trello is a kanban board and not much more. Easylim is a full workspace with kanban, projects, docs, AI and time tracking — without paid Power-Ups for every basic feature.

Compare
Easylim vs Asana

Asana

Asana is powerful, but most of the genuinely useful features sit behind higher-priced plans. Easylim gives you the same project depth without upselling at every step.

Compare
Easylim vs monday.com

monday.com

monday is a great product, but expensive and complex for smaller teams. Easylim covers the same scenarios more simply, more cheaply and with more built-in features.

Compare
Easylim vs ClickUp

ClickUp

ClickUp tries to be "everything for everyone" — and that's its biggest weakness. Constant lag, a bloated UI and AI you have to pay extra for. Easylim ships the same feature set, but faster and simpler.

Compare
Easylim vs Notion

Notion

Notion is a great notebook trying to be a PM system. No Gantt by default, no time tracking, no dashboards, no real forms. Easylim keeps the full power of project management and gives you docs next to it.

Compare
Easylim vs Basecamp

Basecamp

Basecamp is a "less is more" philosophy — but sometimes it's too little. No Gantt, no time tracking, no forms, no dashboards, no custom fields. Easylim stays simple while giving you the full toolkit.

Compare
Easylim vs Jira

Jira

Jira was built for developers — and it shows. Without Confluence in the package, no docs. Without add-ons, no whiteboard, forms or proper time tracking. Easylim brings the whole team into one space.

Compare
Easylim vs Worksection

Worksection

Worksection is familiar to many CEE teams, but the UI and features lag behind modern tools. AI only on Business+, no whiteboard, no screen recording, no full-fledged docs. Easylim is the next generation without losing the local experience.

Compare

Deep dive

How to pick a PM tool without regret — and why migrating off Jira isn't always worth it

5 chapters

Picking a task manager or PM platform looks easy: watch five YouTube reviews, do the math, run a trial. The reality is that 7 out of 10 teams regret their choice within a year — not because the tool is bad, but because they picked it on <strong>the wrong criteria</strong>. Below: how to read comparison tables without the marketing layer, which 5 dimensions actually matter (and which don't), the typical mistakes that cost the most money, and the case for <em>not</em> migrating off the tool you already have.

01

Розділ

The 5 dimensions that actually matter — and 5 that don't

Most comparison articles measure what's easy to measure: number of features, count of integrations, sticker price. This is almost always misleading. A 15-person team won't use 1000 ClickUp integrations — they'll use 5. They won't touch 200 Jira features — they have 10 recurring task types.

What actually matters: (1) cost per seat over 3 years including the upgrades you'll be pushed into — not month one; (2) the number of task views your team actually uses (Kanban + calendar + dashboard is already three and it's the most common stack); (3) document and wiki quality — Notion still leads, with Easylim and ClickUp close behind; (4) presence of the 5-7 integrations you use daily (Slack, Google Calendar, GitHub) — not 1000 in a directory; (5) onboarding speed for new hires — how long until they ship something useful.

What doesn't matter, despite the marketing: total feature count, AI assistant presence (everyone has one now and they're all roughly equally mediocre), "beautiful design" (you stop noticing it after a week), number of UI languages (if your team speaks two — it's irrelevant).

  • Cost per seat over 3 years > month-one pricing.
  • 5-7 daily integrations > 1000 in the catalog.
  • Time to first useful action > total feature count.
5 tools · 5 dimensions
EasylimAsanaClickUpNotionTrelloPrice /seat
$5
$11
$7
$10
$5
PM views
6
4
7
2
1
Docs / wiki
✓
lite
lite
✓✓
–
Integrations
80+
300+
1000+
100+
200+
UX simplicity
●●●
●●
●
●●
●●●

highlight = strongest in row

02

Розділ

How to pick which comparison to read — start from what you're already running

The most useful comparison isn't "Easylim vs everything." It's Easylim vs what's already on your team's screens (or what isn't working there). That's why this hub has six targeted comparison pages — pick the one that describes your current tool, not a generic shortlist.

If you're on Excel/Google Sheets — start with the Notion comparison; it's the most honest bridge from spreadsheets to structured work. If you already use Trello or another lightweight Kanban — read Easylim vs Trello: we'll show where we go deeper and where Trello stays simpler. If you're suffering on Jira (and most teams that care about their time are) — Easylim vs Jira shows where you can cut, and where Jira still earns its complexity for specific use cases.

If you're on Asana, Monday, or ClickUp — this is the trickiest migration case, because those tools overlap with us 80% on features. Migrating only makes sense when price has become a problem (Asana scales price the fastest with team size) or the UX is no longer tolerated and people have started avoiding the tool. In every other case — stay where you are.

  • Spreadsheets → Notion (lowest-friction migration).
  • Trello → Easylim — when simple stopped being enough.
  • Jira → Easylim — when admin time exceeds shipping time.
find your comparison
What do you use today?
Spreadsheets→ Notion
Kanban tool→ Trello
Heavy PM tool→ Jira
Read the head-to-head comparison
03

Розділ

What a real migration looks like — and why the "3-week re-platform" is a myth

The biggest psychological barrier to switching isn't price, it's fear of migration. "We have 800 tasks in Asana, 4 years of history, reminders, Slack integrations..." That history feels massive, but 90% of it is archive that nobody opens.

The real Easylim migration plan: export from your current tool (CSV/JSON, 5 minutes) → field mapping in our importer (15 minutes for the standard set of task / status / assignee / due date / tag) → import active projects (10 minutes) → 30-minute team onboarding session. Total — about an hour, not three weeks.

What NOT to migrate: archive tasks older than 6 months (leave the old tool in read-only mode for 90 days, dip in when you need it); custom automations (most of them aren't needed, you'll notice the absence if any actually are); integrations you use less than once a week. If you're a 200-person organization with a complex org chart — add one week for a pilot in a single department before rolling out everywhere.

  • Import active projects only. Archive stays in read-only.
  • Field mapping is automatic for 80% of structures.
  • Teams under 30: one hour. Teams of 200+: one week with a pilot.
migration · under an hour

1. Export

CSV / JSON · 5 min

done

2. Map fields

auto + manual · 15 min

done

3. Import

projects + tasks · 10 min

done

4. Onboard

team training · 30 min

done
Total: ~60 min · zero downtime
04

Розділ

The real 3-year cost — and why the "Notion + Asana" stack costs more than a single tool

A 15-person team rarely does the 3-year TCO math — but that's the horizon where the real gap shows up. Easylim Team — $5/seat × 15 × 36 months = $2,700. Grow to 25 in year two — $4,500. By year three — about $5,400 cumulative. ClickUp at the same scale lands around $9k over 3 years (higher sticker plus faster upgrade pressure).

The most expensive trap is the "Notion for docs + Asana for tasks" stack. At 15 seats that's $10 Notion + $11 Asana = $21/seat, or about $11,340 over 3 years. The pitch is "best-in-class for each job," but the real cost is 2x the subscription plus the hidden tax: context switching (the average knowledge worker spends 90 minutes/day moving between tabs), desynced information (task in Asana, context in Notion, debate in Slack — three places for one thought), and separate onboardings every time you hire.

This doesn't mean a single tool always wins. If your team already loves Notion and has 200 working pages there — don't migrate to a worse wiki to save $5. The hybrid stack can be justified, but do the honest math: total subscriptions, time lost switching, count of dropped handoffs per month.

  • On 3 years Easylim Team saves $6-9k vs ClickUp/Asana at 15 seats.
  • 2-tool stack = 2x price + hidden context-switching cost.
  • Don't migrate if your team loves the current wiki — hybrid is fine.
3-year TCO · team of 15
Easylim

Y1

Y2

Y3

$5.4kClickUp

Y1

Y2

Y3

$9kNotion + Asana

Y1

Y2

Y3

$14.4k
Easylim saves $9k over 3 years vs Notion+Asana stack.
05

Розділ

When NOT to switch tools — and when Easylim is the wrong answer

The most expensive migration is the one you didn't need to do. If your team is shipping productively in their current tool, people know where things are, and processes are stable — don't migrate. The $5/seat you'd save isn't worth 3 months of transition chaos and a 20% productivity dip in the first quarter.

Specific cases where you should NOT move to Easylim: (1) your CTO has standardized Jira across 50+ engineers — Jira is intentionally deeper for that workflow and switching breaks more than it fixes; (2) you're already running a deep Salesforce or Microsoft 365 stack with task tooling wired into it through 5 integration points — tearing those down costs more than any UX gain; (3) your team is under 3 people — any real PM tool (us included) is overkill, see the usage hub and read the freelancer playbook.

When Easylim is the wrong answer regardless of price: heavy regulatory needs (HIPAA-compliant on-prem, FedRAMP-bound government contracts, banking-grade requirements) — we're not certified there yet. Manufacturing teams with CAD/SAP integration — our focus is knowledge work, not the shop floor. If you genuinely need a Gantt chart with resource leveling across 500+ tasks and dependencies — try us, but our Gantt is built for teams with under 100 tasks per project, not for massive construction programs.

The biggest selection mistake: choosing a tool from a demo instead of from a one-week trial with the team's real tasks. A demo is theatre, a trial is reality. If your team hasn't quietly switched back to the old tool after a week — that's the real signal.

  • If it's working — don't change it. $5 saved isn't worth a chaotic quarter.
  • 50+ engineers on Jira — not our zone, leave it alone.
  • Heavy regulation (HIPAA, FedRAMP, on-prem banking) — not us yet.
all-in-one vs best-of-breed
Best-of-breed stack
Slack
Asana
Notion
Loom
Toggl
Zapier
  • 6 logins · 6 invoices
  • Context lost between tools
  • $45/seat total
Easylim
All-in-one platform
Easylim
  • ✓ 1 login · 1 invoice
  • ✓ Tasks · docs · calendar in 1 place
  • ✓ $5-15/seat all-in

pick stack if you already love each tool · pick all-in-one if not

Quick takeaways

  • 1Compare against what you already run — not an abstract competitor shortlist.
  • 2Calculate 3-year TCO with upgrades and the hidden cost of context switching.
  • 3Migrating active projects = one hour. Leave the archive in read-only.
  • 4The most expensive migration is the one you didn't need to do.
Easylim vs Trello, Asana, monday, ClickUp and more | Easylim